Buy Made in the U.S.A
These words have been annoying me for quite some time now. Its obvious that many Americans labor under the assumption that the American manufacturing infrastructure is a phoenix preparing its epic rise from the ashes. America will never produce as it did in the past. A large reason for this has to do with an unwarranted sense of entitlement and the fact that the American infrastructure can no longer support the old system.
Why does this country want to regain its manufacturing power?
Some fear that foreign countries could simply cut the U.S. off on a whim, preventing us from purchasing goods from certain countries. This reasoning is defensive and tribal. Countries stockpile nuclear weapons in a game of mutually assured destruction, and the cry for increased manufacturing is simply another defense mechanism. Playing defense can never lead to development; there’s an offensive aspect that is necessary for growth. The isolationist perspective held by many Americans is also damaging. It’s absurd to think that there’s a mystical set of jobs that are owned by Americans and off limits to everyone else. Most consumer goods come from China because people in that country are willing to work harder for exponentially less pay. The job rightfully goes to the worker that will work the hardest for less. It’s all very capitalistic isn’t it? Americans should praise those who work harder, if our supposed capitalist underpinnings are legitimate.
It’s all about the money. Manufacturing was, at one point, an excellent way of making a living. Plant workers could provide an excellent life for their families by simply working a full time job. After years of riding the wave, the manufacturing industry was decimated, and workers were quick to find out that the real world was not willing to pay for unskilled, uneducated labor. Even the government enforced this lesson by resorting to overseas labor for the construction of military vehicles.
The population does not shop at Walmart because it is forced to.
Cheap goods require cheap labor, and the purchasing habits of Americans will not allow for expensive American-made goods, unless these goods provide something that can’t be found in other products. The government could resort to massive tariffs; however, this would only cripple the struggling population. The old system competes for market share of cheap goods, but it’s apparent that America will have to focus on innovating to regain its stance as a force to be reckoned with.
The realistic solution is simple: shut up and do something about it. Are we so foolish to think that we can ignore “survival of the fittest”? Limiting competition by passing stringent import and immigration laws is a shameful way of prolonging the inevitable. Success requires adaptation, and those who are willing to pursue learning beyond the roots of manual labor will find success. Embrace technology because it’s required to survive. The United States could never compete with overseas labor and the country was only temporarily bolstered by being the only fish in the sea. In a country where working ethic is supposed to be flowing through the veins of every citizen there is a disproportionate amount of complacency.
Perhaps this all seems a bit harsh, but the growth in international communication has made it impossible to continue holding on to the idea that the U.S. operates within its own, private realm of existence. Success will require innovation and artistry. For years people have been told that obedience will provide monetary comfort. but the days of finding success as a cog are over.
For decades workers showed up, punched in, punched out, and left. This brought a promise of protection from the uncertainties of a life without a guaranteed paycheck. This lifestyle promoted complacency and conformity. The system worked for a while, but the perceived security was merely that, and employees soon realized that there was no job safety net. Cookie-cutter employees were safe when the economy was blooming, but the time of perpetual bloom passed decades ago. The perceived security disappears when companies and consumers choose to abandon the worker that settled for security and the mediocrity that came with it.
Fortunately, there’s plenty of room for success for those whom have been disenfranchised by the industrial system. Unfortunately, most have been told how to behave for so long that they no longer understand how to function in an environment that demands anything more than showing up.
The term “self-motivated” is evolving.
The industrial mindset is reflected in all aspects of American work culture, not just on the plant floor. I returned to a part time job in order to make some extra cash for graduate school and considered asking for more than the standard minimum wage that was paid to all seasonal employees. I figured that I deserved more money; after all, I showed up on time everyday and did all that I was asked. I began to consider how unreasonable it was for me to expect to make more than minimum wage for simply showing up. Everyone shows up, and those who don’t are fired without mercy. Sure, I considered myself pleasant to work with and obedient, but there was nothing that made me irreplaceable. Anyone could do what I was doing and, seeing as the company product was something irrelevant to my lifestyle, most people could do it better. Anyone can complete the tasks required for a minimum-wage job which is why the term “minimum” is so telling. In order to become irreplaceable it is vital to act even when no guiding voice is present. If an instruction manual can be created for a person’s job, the person is replaceable. This person has no place in evolving culture because the days of assembly line work ethic are over. It is only through a renewed sense of passion and initiative that we will be able to forge our own paths.